Representation and Political Ideology
Source A
Source B
To what extent do the elements of media language used in Sources A and B convey different values, attitudes and beliefs about the world?
In your answer you must:
- Analyse the ways in which media language has been used in combination in sources A and B to convey values, attitudes and beliefs about the world
- Refer to relevant contexts and academic ideas and arguments in your analysis
- Draw judgements and conclusions in relation to the question
We see Two newspapers that have the story of the past migrant crisis in the UK.
The daily mail and the guardian both have interesting views on the migrant crisis with the mail using, almost attacking Cameron for linking them as insects, and we also see this in the main headline "The swarm in our streets" this links them too bees as they are usually associated with the term swarm, and the readers will feel like the mail (being right wing and are in support in brexit although this was before brexit), are also attacking on the migrants.
the guardian, being a more socialist paper uses words like shocking and cruel which could have many interpretations but linking back to them being a socialist paper we interpret that they feel for the migrants as they would have had a long and hard journey to get to the UK in the first place.
in conclusion we see that both paper have had their say on the migrant crisis in the uk. the guardian have been more thoughtful perhaps and have focused on this poor people in their eyes and this is expected from the left wing paper as they tend to be more of a social paper and have clearly thought of the welfare of these people. however the daily mail have linked this more with politics and as the conservatives were in charge back then they use Camerons words although he is right wing in many people thoughts, they seem to care do the daily mail but not as much as the guardian and this tells us, Do they really care?
the guardian, being a more socialist paper uses words like shocking and cruel which could have many interpretations but linking back to them being a socialist paper we interpret that they feel for the migrants as they would have had a long and hard journey to get to the UK in the first place.
in conclusion we see that both paper have had their say on the migrant crisis in the uk. the guardian have been more thoughtful perhaps and have focused on this poor people in their eyes and this is expected from the left wing paper as they tend to be more of a social paper and have clearly thought of the welfare of these people. however the daily mail have linked this more with politics and as the conservatives were in charge back then they use Camerons words although he is right wing in many people thoughts, they seem to care do the daily mail but not as much as the guardian and this tells us, Do they really care?
Comments
Post a Comment